<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Taming Email</title>
        <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/</link>
        <description>Tips, Tricks and Essays on Email Overload and Taming the Beast that is Email</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:27:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Art of Plowing Through</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>There's one bad habit that most people have (myself included) that leads to
an overflowing inbox.</p>
<p>There's one good habit that, if adopted, can reduce the clutter
<em>dramatically</em>. I'll go out on a limb and say that this one technique,
if adopted religiously, can reduce the size of your currently unmanaged inbox
by as much as 80%.</p>
<p>I'll call it "plowing through" but that doesn't do it justice because
there's actually rationale and logic behind it. Others refer to it as "just do
it"; a take-off on the old Nike slogan.</p>
]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/the_art_of_plowing_through.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/the_art_of_plowing_through.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Dealing With the Email You Get</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:27:30 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Attachments are Evil and Over-used</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>OK, the "evil" part of the title here is really just to get your attention -
it's the second part that's the real problem: attachments are over-used.</p>
<p>And over-used attachments? <em>Those</em> are evil.</p>
<p>How are they evil?</p>
<p>Let me count the ways.</p>
]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/attachments_are_evil_and_overused.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/attachments_are_evil_and_overused.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Communicating Effectively</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:46:11 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Count to 10, to 100, to 1000 if you have to.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>As I've discussed before, <a href=
"http://www.tamingemail.com/email_is_never_urgent_really.html">email is not
urgent</a>. Really.</p>
<p>And yet we persist in treating as such.</p>
<p>Add to that the experience of getting an email on a topic you feel
passionately about, and it's a recipe for a communications disaster.</p>
<p>I'm sure we've all been there. You're on a mailing list or in some kind of
on-line discussion and someone says something that, to you, is outrageous -
literally provoking outrage. You then experience an urge, a desire, a
<em>need</em>, to respond, to respond before anyone else does, and to respond
strongly to put that person in their place. Perhaps you want to point out the
error of their ways and their thinking, and then perhaps move on to topics such
as their parentage and personal hygiene.</p>
<p>And that's when all hell breaks loose.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/count_to_10_to_100_to_1000_if_you_have_to.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/count_to_10_to_100_to_1000_if_you_have_to.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Communicating Effectively</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:32:18 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Use Plain Format - Substance Over Style</title>
            <description><![CDATA[    <p>
      There's a good chance I'm going to get branded as a techie-luddite (a
      contradiction in terms if there ever was one) for the recommendation I'm
      about to make.
    </p>
    <p>
      I believe that 90% of your outgoing email should be in plain text format. Maybe more.
    </p>
    <p>
      Why?
    </p>
    <p>
      Aside from a collection of technical reasons I'll get to in a minute,
      it's simple really: you want people to focus on what you have to say, not
      how it looks. Lots of formatting, backgrounds, highlighting and using
      many different fonts and styles are all things that distract from your
      words. They're more about making your message "pretty" to look at, and
      rarely add value to your ideas.
    </p>
    <p>
      I'm not saying <em>never</em> use HTML (or Rich Text) email, but I am
      saying default to using plain text and only use HTML email when you
      really need to, which is actually pretty rare.
    </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/use_plain_format_substance_over_style.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/use_plain_format_substance_over_style.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Communicating Effectively</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:13:12 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Email is never urgent. Really.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>One thing that many people fail to realize is that email was never meant to
be "real time". The entire email infrastructure is built to expect and properly
handle delays ranging from minutes to hours to even days. While <em>most of the
time</em> email arrives nearly instantaneously, the fact is you can't count on
it.</p>
<p>Understanding that can be very, very freeing.</p>
<p>We'll look at this from two perspectives: what email delays can mean to you
as a sender, and how understand that email can be delayed can affect how you
work with email as a recipient.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/email_is_never_urgent_really.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/email_is_never_urgent_really.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Dealing With the Email You Get</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:18:19 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>One Simple Trick to Getting Less Email</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href=
"http://www.TamingEmail.com/is_a_response_really_required.html">previously
published essay</a>, I took the position that quite often you don't have to
reply to an email you receive. In fact, while it's frequently a knee-jerk
reaction to reply - even if only to agree with someone - it's also frequently
the wrong thing to do and simply clutters up everyone's inboxes and wastes your
time and theirs.</p>
<p>That essay closed with a simple little statement:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>So if you need a selfish argument, it's that only replying appropriately
will, as a side effect, also reduce the amount of email you need to deal with
as well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here's the gem hidden in that statement: <em>it's not just about
replies</em>.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/one_simple_trick_to_getting_less_email.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/one_simple_trick_to_getting_less_email.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Getting Less Email</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:26:36 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Is a Response Really Required?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Me Too!</strong></p>
<p>Or as the geekier folks often write it:</p>
<p>&lt;AOL&gt;<br />
me too!<br />
&lt;/AOL&gt;</p>
<p>I really don't know what it is that causes it, but for some reason email
seems to bring out the "me too" in many people. You know what I mean: you'll
have a discussion, either one-on-one correspondence or more commonly an
exchange on a mailing list, and at its close or at some other juncture, you'll
get a completely content-free email or collection of emails from some of the
participants.</p>
<p>Perhaps we feel the need to let people know we're listening. Perhaps it's
the email equivalent of an head nod. The problem is, as I said, that it's
otherwise completely content free. As a result, unlike an actual head nod, it's
difficult to ignore. Someone must download it, read it, determine its value (if
any), and then dispose of it.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/is_a_response_really_required.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/is_a_response_really_required.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Dealing With the Email You Get</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:20:13 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Don&apos;t Ask for Spam</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I see a lot of people asking for spam every day.</p>
<p>Yes, I see people <strong>asking</strong> for spam.</p>
<p>It's like they're putting a large sign on their virtual backside saying
"Spam Me! Please!"</p>
<p>Oh, they don't realize that they're asking for spam, and if you asked them
if that's what they want, they'd probably say "No, Definitely Not!" in the strongest of
terms. And yet, I'll claim, strongly, that they're doing so. Perhaps not
intentionally, but they're asking for it.</p>
<p>Are you?</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/dont_ask_for_spam.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/dont_ask_for_spam.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Getting Less Email</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:14:34 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Most Under-Used Key on Your Keyboard</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Man oh man, do people get bent out of shape about spam and the size of their
inbox. It's simply amazing. I occasionally get questions out at <a href=
"http://ask-leo.com" target="_blank">Ask Leo!</a> where people are clearly
extremely upset, apparently tearing their hair out at having to deal with
spam.</p>
<p>I just shake my head.</p>
<p>My advice?</p>
<p>Chill out, relax, get over it, and use the most under-used key on your
keyboard.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/the_most_underused_key_on_your_keyboard.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/the_most_underused_key_on_your_keyboard.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Dealing With the Email You Get</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 17:01:31 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Subjects are Everything</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>When faced with a flood of email in your inbox, how do you decide what's
worth looking at? What are the criteria you use to decide where to spend your
valuable time?</p>
<p>I don't know about you, but I actually look at the Subject field first.
Often before I even look at who the email is from.</p>
<p>Now, I can almost hear many of you already saying "Yeah, subject line, big
deal. Whatever. It's not that important."</p>
<p><em>You are so wrong.</em></p>
<p>My guess is that even you look at the subject of the message (before or
after seeing who it's from) before you do anything. I'll bet you immediately
look at anything that sounds important, on-topic or relevant to your situation,
and skip the rest - either for later, or for "when I get around to it", which
is really just another way of saying "never".</p>
<p>Now imagine you're trying to get your email read by someone who's incredibly
busy, and suffering form email overload because they haven't been reading
<a href="http://www.tamingemail.com">Taming Email</a>. What are they going to
pay attention to first? The email whose subject line tells them clearly what
the message is about.</p>
<p>It only makes sense.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/subjects_are_everything.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/subjects_are_everything.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Communicating Effectively</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Do I Have New Mail? Do I Have New Mail? Do I ...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the common frustrations I hear from people regarding email is the
feeling of being not only swamped, but "at the mercy" of their inbox. When
email arrives they feel they have to act on it right away, regardless of
whatever they're doing.</p>
<p>Factoring in the "New Mail" sound of many email programs, it becomes
Pavlovian - we hear the sound and like a well trained puppy we go check our
email, interrupting whatever we were doing.</p>
<p>Who's controlling who? Or rather, what's controlling you?</p>
<p>At a conference a couple of years ago, a good friend made a simple
suggestion had improved his productivity <em>dramatically</em>. You almost
could feel the productivity of the room increase as others implemented his
oh-so-simple suggestion.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/do_i_have_new_mail_do_i_have_new_mail_do_i_.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/do_i_have_new_mail_do_i_have_new_mail_do_i_.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Dealing With the Email You Get</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Golden Rule</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>As I've said before, and probably will say again, understanding how your email
client processes message rules and then using that feature is perhaps the
single most effective thing you can do to help get your email under control.
Rules really are that powerful.</p>
<p>So today I'm going to look at creating just one rule, the one rule I
consider to be the most important rule you can have. So important that I'll
call it <strong>The Golden Rule</strong>.</p>
<p>The popular Golden Rule goes something like this: "Do unto others as you
would have them do unto you." Our golden rule isn't really all that different,
at least in intent. It's more along the lines of "Prioritize the people you
know."</p>
<p>If I could have only one message rule, this would be it.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/the_golden_rule.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/the_golden_rule.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Rules</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:57:30 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Rules to Live By</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>If you get a lot of email, think about how you deal with it as you process
it. Chances are you see who it's from, or who it's too, or perhaps even what
it's about, and based on that, you decide what to do with the email. You might
respond to it immediately if it's from someone important. You might leave it
for later if it's a subscription to an email newsletter. Heck, you might even
delete it if it's from someone you never want to hear from again.</p>
<p>(I'm going to assume, for the moment, that your spam is taken care of
elsewhere. Obviously in most cases, deleting spam is probably a goodly portion
of what you're doing too. Dealing with spam, however, is a topic for another
day.)</p>
<p>Wouldn't it be nice if you had someone to sort your email for you? Show you
the email that's most important to you first? Perhaps even collect all those
email newsletters for you to read and peruse later, when you had the time?
Perhaps even completely filter out the email that you simply don't want to
see?</p>
<p>Well, you already have such an assistant.</p>
<p>Inbox Rules.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/rules_to_live_by.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/rules_to_live_by.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Rules</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Choosing an Email Program</title>
            <description><![CDATA[  <p>
   I spend a good portion of my life in Microsoft Outlook (2003, the most recent version). For various reasons, Outlook has become
   my email program of choice since before it was even called Outlook. That's not to say I haven't looked at other email programs.
   I keep a copy of Outlook Express ready for answering people's questions. I have Mozilla Thunderbird installed for it's newsgroup
   reader, for the available email encryption add-on, and for it's ability to just "suck up" email in raw, plain text. I even have
   a copy of a non-GUI email program called Pine, and regularly use the the old Unix/Linux plain vanilla workhorse "mail".
  </p>
  <p>
   Apparently a lot of my life revolves around email.
  </p>
  <p>
   Unless you're a geek like me (and heaven help you if you are), you don't need a long list of email programs. You probably just
   need one. The right one, of course.
  </p>
  <p>
   So which one <em>do</em> you need? And how do you choose from the tens or perhaps hundreds of other choices?
  </p>
  <p>
   How do you choose what email program to use?
  </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/choosing_an_email_program.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/choosing_an_email_program.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tools and Techniques</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Opting In, Opting Out</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>As I reviewed the amount of email that I get, both in aggregate when I
<a href="/thats_a_lot_of_mail.html">looked at last year's email</a>, and just
in passing as I deal with my day-to-day email, it occurred to me that a lot of
the email I was getting was by choice, or by failing to make a choice when I
had the chance. Hence, I started making some different choices, and started
reducing the email I was getting.</p>
<p>In short, I asked the senders to stop.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.TamingEmail.com/opting_in_opting_out.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.TamingEmail.com/opting_in_opting_out.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Getting Less Email</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:26:50 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
